When entering into the pleading agreement, the prosecutor is required to take into account the public interest, the seriousness of the sentence and the personal characteristics of the accused. (Article 210 of the Georgian Code of Criminal Procedure) To prevent abuse of power, the legislation provides for the written consent of the supervisory prosecutor as a necessary condition for the conclusion of a pleading agreement and the amendment of its provisions. (Article 210 of the Georgian Code of Criminal Procedure) (F) the admission of guilt was filed on the express condition, approved by the judge, that the plea may be withdrawn if the charge or concessions were subsequently rejected by the court. (c) When considering a pleading agreement, the prosecutor may accept one or more of the following agreements, depending on the circumstances of each case: another situation in which an innocent accused may plead guilty is in the case of an accused who is unable to post bail and who is being held in a prison or detention centre. Since it can take months or even years before criminal trials are tried or even charged in some jurisdictions, an innocent defendant who is offered a plea involving a lower sentence than he or she would usually spend in prison to await a charge or trial may accept the pleading agreement and plead guilty.  (c) Alternatively to withdrawing an admission of guilt or a Nolo call for tenders, the Tribunal may order the government to comply with the promises or conditions of an opposition agreement if it is within the tribunal`s authority and the court finds, at its discretion, that a particular performance is the appropriate remedy for a breach of the agreement. (b) If a defendant pleads in favour of nolo contendere or pleads guilty, while denying fault, the Tribunal should pay particular attention to ensuring that there is a factual basis for the plea. An accused`s offer to plead guilty should not be rejected solely because the accused refuses to admit fault. Such a plea may be rejected if the Tribunal has particular reasons for doing so which are recorded in the minutes.
Good deals are just as likely in strong and weak cases. Prosecutors only have to adapt the offer to the likelihood of a conviction to reach an agreement. Thus, weaker cases lead to more lenient pleadings and stronger relative harshness, but both result in an agreement. [. If the case is weak, the parties must rely on the lawsuits. But [royalty negotiations] are hardly an obstacle. Negotiations on royalties in low cases are not the exception; This is the norm across the country. Even if the evidence against innocent defendants is on average lower, the likelihood of pleadings does not depend on guilt. (b) a diversion agreement should be recorded in writing, containing all agreed terms.
As a precondition for distraction, an offender may, to the extent permitted by law, be required to waive a prompt procedure and provide for a limitation period, and may also be required to meet other appropriate conditions, for example. B to participate in a treatment program, perform community service, make a refund and/or refrain from drug use and criminal activities. In other cases, formal pleadings are limited to Pakistan, but the prosecutor has the power to drop a case or charge in a case, and in practice he often does, in exchange for an accused pleading guilty to a lesser charge. There is no negotiation on the sentence, which is the only privilege of the court. (c) The judge should not directly or indirectly inform the accused or defence counsel that a pleading agreement or admission of guilt should not be accepted directly or indirectly. (D) the defendant failed to obtain the tariff or criminal concessions provided for in the pleading agreement and the prosecutor failed to seek or refuse such concessions, as promised in the pleading agreement; or (a) When accepting an admission of guilt or a plea of guilt, the Tribunal should conduct such investigations as may be necessary to ensure that there is a real basis for the plea. . . .